Ferrari present indicators of progress in Canadian GP as David Coulthard praises improved communication with Charles Leclerc
Ferrari as soon as once more left the Canadian Grand Prix on the 4.361-kilometre Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve in Montreal grappling with their place within the 2025 Method 1 pecking order, as they appeared to have solely the fourth-fastest automotive in Montreal. Whereas Mercedes joined McLaren and Pink Bull within the checklist of race winners this season—due to a commanding drive from George Russell—Ferrari have been left making an attempt to salvage factors amid a irritating weekend.
McLaren have emerged because the dominant power in 2025, constantly setting the tempo, however Pink Bull and Max Verstappen have ensured a aggressive title battle by staying in shut pursuit. Amid this, Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton have been restricted to fifth and sixth-place finishes respectively at Circuit Gilles Villeneuve.
Lewis Hamilton encountered points in the course of the race, together with brake complaints over crew radio and injury to his flooring after an unlucky collision with a groundhog. In the meantime, Charles Leclerc made regular beneficial properties following a difficult qualifying session however was by no means really in competition for a podium end, which might have been his fourth of the 12 months.
Regardless of the modest end result, former F1 driver David Coulthard noticed a key improvement that steered progress throughout the Ferrari camp. He picked up on a second of in-race radio communication between Charles Leclerc and his race engineer Bryan Bozzi that, in his view, mirrored a extra assertive and coherent operational strategy—one thing the Scuderia has been criticized for missing in latest seasons.
David Coulthard applauds Ferrari’s authoritative race name with Leclerc in Montreal
Whereas working as a part of Channel 4’s broadcast crew for the Canadian Grand Prix, Coulthard famous a radio alternate during which Charles Leclerc’s engineer instructed him to modify to “Plan B.” Leclerc, nevertheless, countered with a desire for “Plan C,” which his engineer acknowledged with out debate. In response to the previous Method 1 driver, this simple and decisive interplay marked a notable change in Ferrari’s strategic demeanor.
David Coulthard later remarked that such a communication was one thing Ferrari had traditionally struggled with, usually exhibiting hesitancy or conflicting directions. In his evaluation, the readability and alignment between driver and crew in Montreal represented a constructive shift. He believed that when a crew and its driver are absolutely in sync, it breeds confidence and in the end results in improved efficiency on monitor.
Charles Leclerc’s technique questions spark criticism from Valsecchi and Villeneuve
Nonetheless, not all observers have been satisfied by Charles Leclerc’s conduct in the course of the race. The Monegasque driver, who has questioned Ferrari’s technique a number of instances this season, later expressed doubts over the crew’s choices in Montreal as properly. He indicated that he believed a one-stop technique may need been viable, though that might have required a protracted ultimate stint on the medium tyres.
The late-race security automotive introduced out by Lando Norris’ crash may have allowed the Ferrari driver to pit with minimal time loss, however by that stage, he could have already compromised his efficiency with extreme tyre put on. In a race the place tyre degradation proved a significant problem, the end result of any alternate technique remained speculative at finest.
Former F1 world champion Jacques Villeneuve weighed in on the radio messages, suggesting that Ferrari wanted higher cohesion between the pit wall and the cockpit. Whereas his criticism was measured, he did level to an absence of constant alignment as one thing the crew should tackle going ahead.
Nonetheless, Davide Valsecchi was way more direct. The Italian pundit dismissed Charles Leclerc’s in-race commentary and said that the driving force ought to concentrate on his efficiency fairly than second-guessing technique choices mid-race. The 2012 GP2 Collection champion implied that given the Monegasque’s errors earlier within the weekend, he wasn’t in a robust place to critique the crew’s calls and insisted that it was time for him to focus on execution fairly than questioning directions.