A brand new scathing report about Tesla simply got here out in China. It describes how the automaker is changing into trigger-happy, suing its personal clients and the media whereas auto journalists are being instructed to not be destructive concerning the American automaker.
To this present day, Tesla is the one overseas automaker with a wholly-owned automobile manufacturing facility in China, though Toyota is predicted to comply with in just a few years.
Elon Musk made the deal occur with Chinese language Communist Get together (CCP) officers again in 2018. Tesla Gigafactory Shanghai grew to become the corporate’s largest manufacturing hub and its largest income and revenue.
Tesla would by no means be the place it’s at the moment with out Gigafactory Shanghai and the Chinese language market.
Now, we be taught that Tesla is prepared to go to nice lengths to guard that.
The Related Press (AP) has simply launched an enchanting in-depth report about Tesla’s actions in China relating to clients and the media.
The report facilities round a brand new perspective on the extremely publicized battle between Tesla and certainly one of its Chinese language clients who claimed a brake defect, nevertheless it additionally goes deeper by highlighting a shit in Tesla’s method to criticism in China.
AP discovered that Tesla sued “a minimum of six automobile homeowners in China who had sudden automobile malfunctions, high quality complaints or accidents they claimed have been attributable to mechanical failures.”
Tesla additionally sued “a minimum of six bloggers and two Chinese language media retailers that wrote critically concerning the firm.”
That is extremely uncommon habits for an automaker.
The report additionally highlights the shut relationship between Tesla and CCP officers, particularly Li Qiang, the previous social gathering boss of Shanghai who’s now China’s premier. He was concerned within the Gigafactory Shanghai deal.
It’s not information that Tesla benefited from preferential remedy in China, however the report goes fairly a bit additional.
AP alleges that native media are instructed to not be destructive on Tesla:
Tesla has profited from the largesse of the Chinese language state, profitable unprecedented regulatory advantages, below-market price loans and enormous tax breaks. With just a few pointed exceptions, Tesla has loved largely ingratiating protection within the Chinese language press, and journalists instructed AP they’ve been instructed to keep away from destructive protection of the automaker.
A reporter instructed AP:
“We have been instructed by our editor that we should always not write negatively about Tesla as a result of it’s a key firm that was launched and guarded by the Shanghai authorities.”
The report additionally explains how Tesla wins about 90% of the court docket circumstances filed in opposition to the automaker by clients who declare a defect.
Many shoppers complained of Tesla’s lack of communication, resulting in submitting lawsuits.
In the event that they file lawsuits, they lose, and in the event that they complain publicly, they’re those getting sued by Tesla and compelled to pay the corporate and make a public apology.
Electrek’s Take
That’s fairly a report. It gave a brand new perspective on Ms. Zhang’s case. Her case made it to Western media in 2021-2022, however by no means with the extent of element on this report.
The info are she obtained into an accident. She claimed it was on account of a brake failure. Tesla claimed it was on account of a driver mistake.
She felt compelled to protest Tesla over what she noticed as a severe security problem. She was fairly persistent with it. Tesla sued her and received as a result of she had no strategy to show {that a} brake defect had brought about the accident. She was compelled to pay Tesla and make a public apology.
However we additionally realized that Tesla claimed that different entities have been backing her regardless of no proof of that in any respect.
I believe there’s room for reflection on Tesla’s half right here. Is that this what it needs to be: an organization that sues its clients and media over criticism?
Like some clients stated within the report, Tesla might have prevented a lot that by merely having higher communications with clients.
FTC: We use earnings incomes auto affiliate hyperlinks. Extra.
