There’s a recurring query among the many followers of the Prancing Horse: why did Ferrari utterly overhaul the structure of the automotive after ending second within the 2024 System 1 Constructors’ Championship, simply 14 factors behind McLaren? Within the final 12 months of the bottom impact rules, the Italian facet determined to revamp its automotive, introducing 99% new elements in line with Ferrari group principal Frederic Vasseur himself.
This subject has been extensively debated not solely on social media but in addition amongst numerous insiders: why wasn’t the SF-24 improvement continued, particularly contemplating it completed final season near the McLaren vehicles, whereas the SF-25, after three races, has plummeted to fourth place among the many high groups, with a drastic drop in competitiveness?
Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton have already collected a 76-point deficit to McLaren within the Constructors’ Championship forward of the Bahrain Grand Prix, having scored solely 35 factors up to now in comparison with 111 from the Woking group, whereas Mercedes has earned 75 factors and Crimson Bull, which runs just one automotive within the high 10, Max Verstappen‘s, has collected 61 factors. There couldn’t have been a worse begin for the Maranello group, however the Italian facet by no means thought of deploying a “carry over” automotive.
The arrival of Lewis Hamilton was an extra push to goal for a leap in high quality, with the idea that Ferrari might goal for 2 World Championships earlier than the drastic regulatory modifications anticipated for the 2026 System 1 season.
So why was the 2025 automotive redesigned? The reply could be very easy: the SF-24 had only a few potentialities for aerodynamic enchancment and its improvement would have been restricted in comparison with the evolution that rivals had deliberate.
The selection, due to this fact, was proper, and within the 2025 price range cap, a major quantity was allotted to approve a brand new chassis with the cockpit moved additional again and a shorter, sleeker gearbox.
The concept was to shift the load distribution barely towards the rear so as to provide extra freedom to the aerodynamic group led by Diego Tondi. The SF-25 single-seater was designed to be beneath the load restrict of 800 kilograms to have the choice of attaining the fitting stability by introducing ballast within the entrance wing, permitting the 0.5% weight distribution tolerance permitted by the rules to be adjusted as desired.
Moreover, the aerodynamic division had requested the chassis chief, Fabio Montecchi, to change from the standard push rod entrance suspension to a pull rod system, already in use by Crimson Bull and McLaren. The wants, due to this fact, weren’t mechanical however stemmed from the idea that wind tunnel testing might yield extra downforce for efficiency.
And evidently, the info rising from the winter simulations needed to be constructive in comparison with the SF-24, fueling the championship hopes that have been repeatedly raised by the drivers and group leaders.
In China and Japan, we noticed F1 vehicles that have been about 1.5 seconds sooner than the earlier 12 months, which is a large enchancment contemplating that, often, by the tip of a regulatory cycle, just a few tenths are discovered as a result of groups are already scraping the barrel with mature vehicles. Nonetheless, the home of playing cards started to break down throughout the preseason testing session on the Bahrain Worldwide Circuit, when it turned clear that McLaren was extra aggressive and Ferrari was struggling.
Initially, consideration was centered on the pull rod suspension: with the brand new setup, there may need been a necessity to regulate the setup, as very completely different stiffness changes are required. However the “subject” with the SF-25 automotive was not discovered there. Observers then shifted their focus to the rear finish, pointing to the transmission: the miniaturized carbon gearbox might endure damaging torsions, stopping the rear from being sufficiently stiff to make the automotive responsive in route modifications, leading to annoying understeer that was closely criticized by the drivers.
The Ferrari SF-25 automotive was designed to be centered on the entrance, as each Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton want, with nice nook entry, however in actuality, it has considerably improved in high-speed sections, due to good aerodynamic effectivity, whereas it has misplaced its traction and dealing with in low-speed corners.
So, what’s lacking for Ferrari? One may say the aerodynamic downforce that presses the automotive onto the monitor floor and generates the power to switch to the tires. With out sufficient downforce, the group is pressured to make use of minimal floor clearance, figuring out that the nearer the automotive is to the bottom, the extra the ground can create downforce. However the put on on the plank needs to be taken under consideration: the FIA permits consumption of 1 of the ten mm thickness of the plank, after which disqualifications are triggered, as occurred to Lewis Hamilton in China.
Past the embarrassment {that a} prestigious group like Ferrari shouldn’t permit, it’s evident that discovering rapid countermeasures isn’t simple. The primary improve bundle for the SF-25 was scheduled for Imola, on the debut of the European season, however after the Sakhir checks, it’s doable that the event plans have been introduced ahead based mostly on what emerged from the wind tunnel work.
So, we are able to count on modifications to the ground in Bahrain, together with different particulars, however it’s exhausting to suppose the hole to the MCL39 and the improved Crimson Bull could be closed in a single go, as a result of the 3-4 tenths hole isn’t simple to cut back, as others received’t stand nonetheless both.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
